Page 728 - Proceedings Collega2023
P. 728

In contrast, bridging social capital is viewed as a heterogeneous relationship for collaboration and
               coordination that is typified by wider and looser network systems with weaker linkages (Cofré-Bravo et al.,
               2019). Since the strength of bridging social capital is the weakness in the ties, the adjective "weak" should
               not be interpreted negatively (Claridge 2018a). This kind of social capital literally refers to the ability to
               "bridge" gaps between members of various social groupings, such as those based on race, religion or class.
               According to Pelling and High (2005), bridging social capital is further defined as an exchange of social
               relationships between groups of people who intend to have similar interests and objectives but have
               different  social  identities.  The  sharing  of  objectives,  concepts  and  innovations  may  help  to  forge  a
               consensus among the organisations, which would then serve to represent the various interests.

                       Lastly, linking social capital is represented as the glue that holds the standards of deference and
               trust between people and institutions that have codified power or authority gradients in society (Cofré-
               Bravo et al. 2019). This so-called open network benefits the actors by granting them access to a variety of
               resources and cutting-edge information (Claridge, 2018b; Cofré-Bravo et al., 2019). Through this social
               network, the actors are given the opportunity for mutual learning and collaboration, which has promoted
               tolerance and social cohesiveness among the actors.
               Traditional Settlement

                       Settlement plays a significant role in the development of human civilization by providing a variety
               of areas to fulfil the demands of the existing and future populations. Each settlement has a unique cultural
               heritage, historical background, social structure and socioeconomic characteristics that each portray the
               distinct identity of the local community. In Malaysia, there are eight distinct sorts of settlements, according
               to the National Village Physical Planning Policy Report 2030 (Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa, 2017).

                       One of them is a traditional settlement, which is a settlement created by locals who desire to live
               and work there while preserving the customs, cultures and knowledge that have been passed down over
               the  years  (Dayaratne, 2018).  It  makes sense  that traditional  settlement would  depict  the  way of  life,
               cultural heritage and social norms of earlier cultures. The formation of traditional settlements began along
               the river and coastline (Syala et al., 2018) in an unplanned or organic manner (Jabatan Perancangan Bandar
               dan Desa, 2017) and the houses were constructed in close proximity to one another. According to Syala et
               al. (2018), the construction of multiple clusters of houses and public areas including open grass fields,
               mosques, jettys and markets marked the beginning of the development of this traditional settlement.
               These physical characteristics are also known as a type of social space in traditional settlements that
               functions as an area for locals to engage in sociocultural activities (Jabatan Perancangan Bandar Dan Desa,
               2017). Social spaces can be said to serve as an important physical feature that symbolises the identity and
               uniqueness of a traditional settlement (Yeoh & Kong, 1995) due to their ability to trigger an understanding
               of cultural continuity and a sense of belonging as well as a sense of place in a local community (Jabatan
               Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia, 2016).

               Social Capital and Social Sustainability
                       The presence of social space or social spaces that serve as communal areas and promote social
               engagement  plays  a  crucial  role  in  enhancing  the  overall  quality  of  community  life  within  a  given
               settlement  (Oldenburg,  2007;  2013).  According  to  Oldenburg's  thesis  (1999),  community  space  is
               commonly known as the "third place". This term refers to locations beyond the confines of one's residence
               and  workplace  where  individuals  within  a  community  choose  to  convene  and  engage  in  voluntary,


               International Conference on Local Wisdom of the Malay Archipelago (COLLEGA 2023) Page - 715 -
   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733