Page 99 - 048
P. 99

  ☺                                                     


            (6) Ismail I, Hassan MA, Rahman NAA, Soon CS. (14) Sreela-or C, Imai T, Plangklang P, Reungsang A.

                 Thermophilic biohydrogen production from palm oil  Optimization of key factors affecting hydrogen
                 mill effluent (POME) using suspended mixed cul-  production from food waste by anaerobic mixed
                 ture. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2010; 34(1):42–47.  cultures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
            (7) Abraham VT, Nair NR, Madhu G. Electrochemical  2011; 36(21):14120-14133.
                 treatment of skim serum effluent from natural rubber (15) Yang PL, Zhang RH, McGarvey JA, Benemann
                 latex centrifuging units. Journal of Hazardous Ma-  JR. Biohydrogen production from cheese processing
                 terials. 2009; 167(1-3):494–499.            wastewater by anaerobic fermentation using mixed
            (8) O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Intrasungkha N,     microbial communities. International Journal of
                 Dhamwichukorn S, Birkeland NK. Optimization of  Hydrogen Energy.  2007; 32(18):4761-4771.
                 simultaneous thermophilic fermentative hydrogen (16) Seifert K, Waligorska M, Wojtowski M, Laniecki
                 production and COD reduction from palm oil mill  M. Hydrogen generation from glycerol in batch
                 effluent by Thermoanaerobacterium-rich sludge.  fermentation process. International Journal of

                 International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;  Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34(9):3671-3678.
                 33(4):1221–1231.                       (17) Jawjit S, Jawjit W, Liengcharernsit W. Anaerobic
            (9) Su H, Cheng J, Zhou J, Song W, Cen K. Improving  mesophilic and thermophilic treatment of concen-
                 hydrogen production from cassava starch by combi-  trated latex processing wastewater in two-stage
                 nation of dark and photo fermentation. International  upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). Environ-
                 Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34        mental Application & Science. 2010; 5(3):329-341.
                 (4):1780–1786.                         (18) Mata-Alvarez J, Mac S, Llabrs P. Anaerobic diges-
            (10) Chong ML, Sabaratnam V, Shirai Y, Hassan MA.  tion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research

                 Biohydrogen production from biomass and indus-  achievements and perspectives. Bioresource
                 trial wastes by dark fermentation. International  Technology. 2000; 74(3):3-16.
                 Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34(8):3277-3287. (19) O-Thong S, Boe K, Angelidaki I. Thermophilic
            (11) Wei J, Liu ZT, Zhang X. Biohydrogen production  anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit
                 from starch wastewater and application in fuel cell.  bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas
                 International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010;  production. Applied Energy. 2012; 93:648–654.
                 35(7):2949-2952.                       (20) Fang HHP, Li CL, Zhang T. Acidophilic
            (12) Akutsu Y, Li YY, Harada H, Yu HQ. Effects of  biohydrogen production from rice slurry. Interna-
                 temperature and substrate concentration on biologi-  tional Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2006; 31(6):
                 cal hydrogen production from starch. International  683-692.
                 Journal of Hydrogen Energy.  2009; 34(6):2558-2566. (21) O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Birkeland NK. Evaluation
            (13) Noparat P, Prasertsan P, O-Thong S. Isolation and  of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed

                 characterization of high hydrogen-producing strain  inocula under thermophilic condition by process
                 Clostridium beijerinckii PS-3 from fermented oil palm  performance and microbial community analysis.
                 sap. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011;  Bioresource Technology. 2009; 100(2):909-918.
                 36(6):14086-14092.
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101